|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 19 post(s) |
Nyota Sol
|
Posted - 2009.03.05 16:37:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Nyota Sol on 05/03/2009 16:38:55
Question:
Will there be greater chances of multiple WHs in w-space systems depending on security rating? i.e. will lowsec or nullsec w-space systems have a significant chance of multiple WHs?
I am planning logistics for a Restaurant at the end of the Universe.
|
Nyota Sol
|
Posted - 2009.03.05 16:42:00 -
[2]
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Originally by: Nyota Sol Will there be greater chances of multiple WHs in w-space systems depending on security rating? i.e. will lowsec of nullsec w-space systems have a significant chance of multiple WHs?
No, the number of 'hits' is completely random, no matter where you are.
Please consider how cool it would be if some pools/clusters of W-space had tended to have multiple WHs and thus caused dynamic branches of W-space.
|
Nyota Sol
|
Posted - 2009.03.06 11:10:00 -
[3]
Originally by: CCP Abathur
Originally by: Gnulpie No static belts in wormhole space. If you want to find some belts, you need to scan them out.
Correct.
Quote: The belts are rubbish at the moment though, the roids are to small and at least the 'easy' wormhole systems have bad ore - in essence, most level 1 mission are better to mine, and they don't have that insane dangers and difficulties of logistics.
But there are still a couple of days to polish up everything
They are getting some love.
Would it be game-breaking to just add another set of concentrated ore types? (i.e. Luscious Veldspar, Radiant Omber, Hulking Scordite)
|
Nyota Sol
|
Posted - 2009.03.06 16:08:00 -
[4]
Originally by: CCP Prism X
Originally by: Katamari D Why do we call it K-space? :(
I keep thinking of it as the reciprocal space spanded by the reciprocal K-vectors. Why not R? R as in Real space? I know that the wormholes just leads to other points in the unknown universe, so it's hardly UNreal space on the other side. Maybe I'm just being picky and I'll get used to it eventually.
You're probably being overly captious. I offer you this as proof: I agree with you
I've been trying to change the nomenclature back to: NEWEDEN and then Sleeper Space but I'm not getting anywhere with it.
P.S. The only reason I decided on the term 'captious' over 'picky' is due to an internal joke, not because I wanted to extra negative connotation.
Let's negotiate.
We'll call it Sleeper-space and Kitty-Space.
|
|
|
|